How LGBTQIA was turned into a global Geopolitical tool

 

It is crucial that we understand how a private sexual behavior that has lasted centuries suddenly became converted into a global political tool to reshape society, education, policy, medicine and population outcome.

 

STEP 1 — Reclassification (to create Legitimacy)

 

• International medical bodies removed homosexuality from psychiatric classifications in which it had previously appeared, without new biological, genetic, or clinical evidence demonstrating a change in etiology.
• A condition previously classified as a mental disorder (within psychiatric diagnostic frameworks) was reframed from a diagnosable condition into a fixed personal “identity”, showcasing a fundamental conceptual shift rather than a scientific discovery.
• After reclassifying homosexual mental disorder as an identity, questioning, or criticizing became a “discrimination”, discouraging open scientific and public debate.
• As a result, existing laws, religious doctrines, cultural norms, and societal frameworks that historically regulated public behaviour were labelled “outdated,” “regressive,” or “unscientific”, despite long-standing social and legal foundations.
• Scientific discourse was replaced with selected experts presented as representing new consensus, despite the absence of evidence-based validation.
• A privately conducted sexual behaviour, formerly a clinical classification, was converted into a protected identity category, forming the basis for later legal, political, and institutional claims including “human rights”.
• The American Psychiatric Association (APA) removed homosexuality from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Second Edition (DSM-II) in 1973, replacing it with “sexual orientation disturbance,” later termed “ego-dystonic homosexuality.” This too was removed in DSM-III-R (1987).
• The World Health Organization (WHO) removed homosexuality from the Mental and Behavioural Disorders chapter of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) in 1990.

This decision was not based on new biological or genetic discoveries, but reflected prevailing social and political attitudes within Western psychiatric and academic institutions.

• WHO retained “ego-dystonic sexual orientation” as a residual diagnostic category in ICD-10; however, this too was removed entirely in ICD-11 (adopted in 2019).
• Philanthropic foundations and donorswith financial interests across pharmaceuticals, media, academia, and international institutions played a significant role in funding, advocacy, and institutional alignment that supported this reclassification.

 

STEP 2 — Rights Framing (to create Legal Pressure)

 

• A private sexual behaviour, once reframed as “identity”, became repositioned as a human rights issue, shifting it from the private sphere into the domain of international law and state obligation.
• Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (SOGI) terminology began to be introduced into UN reports, guidance documents, policy frameworks, and committee outputs, without formal amendment of ratified treaties and often disregarding existing treaty language and limitations.
• UN agencies and treaty-monitoring committees initiated expansive reinterpretations of existing conventions, advancing SOGI-based readings that were not included in treaty texts but influenced by ideological and donor influence.
• These committee recommendations and general comments, which carry no binding legal force, were nevertheless presented to governments as authoritative or obligatory.
• Governments were informed-formally and informally-that compliance was necessary to meet international expectations, maintain diplomatic standing, obtain loans, or avoid reputational and political consequences.
• As a result, national legislatures were bypassed, with pressure placed on:
  • Public Servants
  • Politicians & Ministries
  • Regulatory bodies
• to introduce policy and legal changes without public consultation or electoral mandate.
• Courts and administrative bodies were encouraged or pressured to apply these reinterpretations, despite the absence of parliamentary approval or domestic legal incorporation using loopholes while also ignoring the existing legal provisions.
• Consequently, policy shifts were implemented quietly through administrative action, regulatory changes, or judicial interpretation, rather than through transparent democratic debate.
• Thus, a privately conducted sexual behaviour-reclassified as an “identity”-was transformed into a perceived state obligation under international pressure.

 

STEP 3 — Using Aid & Diplomacy as Leverage (Forcing Compliance)

 

The insidious nature of the project is clear when its international roll out is tied to

• Aid
• Loans
• Trade
• Diplomatic approval
• Development goals
• Non-compliance risks sanctions, funding loss, reputational damage.
• Small economies cannot afford resistance.
• Entities that claim to honor national sovereignty is arm-twisting & forcing nations to compromise their sovereignty
• National governments choose to adopt policies to avoid punishment & remain in power even though citizens disagree.

 

This is how diplomatic & economic pressure replaces democratic consent.

 

STEP 4 — Cultural Normalisation (Disarming Resistance)

 

• Having forced national governments to adopt by any means the next step is to spread it amongst the population. For this, numerous modes of media channels and their owners and activists are lined up.
• Media, films, teledramas, columnists/articles, talk shows, panel discussions, sponsoring ads, celebrities, and social platforms are used to promote LGBTQIA as:
  • Progressive
  • Fashionable
  • Inevitable
  • With openings for jobs, promotions, scholarships, and even refugee/asylum applications.
• Media is used as repetition conditions perception and repetitions through multiple platforms & methods creates the desired effect (public conditioning)
• Dissent is labelled “hate” or “ignorance”.
• Social pressure replaces rational discussion.
• Alternate views and warnings are not entertained or given any opportunity to reach out to the people.
• Parents, teachers, and religious leaders who foresee the dangers are forced to voluntarily create their own programs for awareness
• Public debate collapses as government & top private sector corporates & their heads have been co-opted into the project.

 

With little or no awareness of dangerous consequences, people end up accepting change before understanding its dangers.

 

STEP 5 — Venturing to Education (Capturing the Next Generation – the most dangerous step with adverse long-term consequences)

 

Concepts are being lined up to be introduced in schools under:

• Inclusion
• Safety
• Anti-bullying

Teacher training and curricula are externally influenced and taking place secretly via UN partnered programs. Same training is taking place to public sector & police as well.

• Children lack cognitive maturity to evaluate ideology. This reality is a reason for attempting to embed the ideology as part of school curriculum.
• Parents are sidelined – totally unaware of what their children are being taught and the ideology being indoctrinated to their young minds.
• Eventually, if allowed “Identity” fixation replaces age-appropriate development.
• Confusion among children is normalised as “discovery”
• Childhood becomes sexualized – sexual fantasies are encouraged to be practiced.

 

Sexualized beliefs take precedence over critical and analytical thinking necessary for their adult life.

 

STEP 6 — Medicalisation (Creating Lifetime Dependency on Medication)

 

• Distress and non-conformity are medicalized by hired “experts”
• Gender-Affirmation pathways are prioritised.
• “experts” recommend hormones and surgeries and ongoing treatment.
• Reversibility is limited or impossible.
• The cost of such to parents of below 21 children is unimaginable on top of the already rising cost of living.
• Children suffer permanent fertility loss which experts rarely inform prior to surgeries.
• Children must bear lifelong medical costs – for a male who thinks he is a she has to take medicines to look like a she though inside he remains a he. Similarly, a female who thinks she is a he has to take medicines to look like a he though inside she remains a she.
• One can imagine the mental and physical complications and trauma that goes on inside a child.
• Every child encouraged to opt for surgeries becomes a New long-term patient for pharma systems.

 

Identity has now become a commercial market for profits.

Children are a source of income for the pharma & medical industry.

 

STEP 7 — Adult Social Outcomes (Weakening a Nation’s Society)

 

• Progress to adulthood with educational guidance is hampered by the introduction of sexualized curriculum directing children’s attention away from studies & equipping themselves necessary qualifications to steer their lives once entering the world of work.
• The LGBTQIA ideology discourages biological marriages & promotes same-sex marriage
• Reduction in biological marriages results in less children born globally. How will this impact Sri Lanka – the Sinhala & Tamil populations especially who are already being subject to various contraception advice and discouraged from having children.
• It also increases mental health burden on not only individuals, but their families & to the nation as well.
• Family structures weaken – children & parents are distanced, expectations of parents are dashed, a child’s natural talents get compromised by venturing into sexualized lifestyles which includes excessive use of substance abuse (drugs, alcohol, smoking etc)
• Individual Productivity declines which extends to national productivity as well.
• Healthcare costs rise – unnecessary burden on the taxpayers to fund unnatural sexual lifestyles & the health consequences arising if legalized.
• Social fragmentation increases.

 

An identity framed as Individual “freedom” produces collective instability to the Nation.

STEP 8 — Population & National Impact (Strategic Outcome of LGBTQIA ideology)

 

• Below-replacement fertility (western nations response is to encourage migrants – for developing nations such options will create major demographic/social problems)
• Aging population.
• Shrinking workforce – poor productivity
• Higher dependency ratios.
• Economic fragility.
• Greater foreign dependence.
• Weakened national resilience with the younger generation’s nationalistic temperament directed elsewhere.
• Loss of long-term sovereignty.

 

What looks like rights policy becomes demographic damage.

How the LGBTQIA ideology evolved

Reclassification from a mental disorder to a “gender identity”
↓
Rights framing
↓
Legal & aid pressure
↓
Cultural normalization
↓
Education capture
↓
Medicalization
↓
Social breakdown
↓
Population decline & national weakening

 

If this were organic, such extensive institutional international pressure would not be necessary.

The scale, coordination, and persistence of enforcement reveal that this is not a spontaneous social evolution, but a managed policy project.

 

The reliance on treaties, funding, education systems, media, and medicine to enforce acceptance exposes it as a top-down ideological project with long-term societal consequences & goals.

When an idea requires sustained pressure on laws, education systems, families, and children, it ceases to be a matter of rights but should become a concern for a Nation.  The pressure itself is the evidence.

This is what we must all realize.

 

Shenali D Waduge